अन्य
ISKCON की अधिकार-रेखाओं में सामंजस्य (Harmonizing ISKCON's Lines of Authority), GBC का नीति-पत्र
ISKCON का शासी निकाय आयोग (GBC)
ISKCON की अधिकार-रेखाओं में सामंजस्य (Harmonizing ISKCON's Lines of Authority), GBC का नीति-पत्र
दस्तावेज़ लोड हो रहा है…
तीर कुंजियों से पृष्ठ बदलें, + और − से ज़ूम करें, 0 से रीसेट करें।
विवरण
फ़ाइलें
1प्रत्येक फ़ाइल उसके SHA-256 हैश के अंतर्गत संग्रहीत है। किसी डाउनलोड को सत्यापित करने के लिए उस पर sha256sum चलाएँ और तुलना करें।
SHA-256
c4fa9d5d359aea0c39d00b7f5bb28967a18456fd52f9577515d0b5420d27fa17
निकाला गया पाठ
खोज के लिए फ़ाइल से स्वचालित रूप से निकाला गया पाठ। अभिलेख स्वयं फ़ाइल है; उद्धृत करने से पहले उसे जाँच लें।
निकाला गया पाठ दिखाएँ
Harmonizing
ISKCON's
Lines
of
Authority
Preface
This
paper
has
been
voted
on
by
the
GBC
and
is
now
an
official
GBC
policy
paper.
The
following
offers
more
about
the
paper’s
purpose
and
scope.
The
topic
of
“Lines
of
Authority”
is
a
heritage
or
legacy
issue.
By
“heritage”
or
“legacy”
issues
we
mean
those
topics
that
are
of
core
importance
to
the
future
of
ISKCON.
These
are
the
issues
that
are
going
to
be
relevant
for
generations
to
come.
How
to
address
them
in
a
way
that
reflects
Srila
Prabhupada’s
intent
and
purpose
will
be
expressed
in
papers
like
this
one.
This
“Lines
of
Authority”
paper
is
not
the
full
and
final
statement
on
this
topic.
Rather,
it
is
a
good
first
step.
The
GBC
fully
expects
that
the
paper
will
be
updated,
made
more
comprehensive,
and
improved
in
the
course
of
time.
Of
special
importance
is
the
section
outlining
conduct
for
gurus,
managers,
and
disci-‐ples.
Starting
implementation
of
these
practices
now
will
provide
the
GBC
with
valuable
feedback
on
where
the
paper
works
and
what
needs
to
be
adjusted
and
improved.
History
of
the
Topic
Several
years
ago
the
GBC
embarked
upon
developing
a
systematic
plan
for
the
future
of
ISKCON.
They
selected
several
issues
of
primary
importance
to
the
movement
and
formed
committees
to
discuss
those
issues.
One
of
the
committees
was
requested
to
study
the
divergent
lines
of
authority
within
ISKCON
and
suggest
a
method
for
settling
disagreements
between
them.
The
members
of
this
committee
were
Bhanu
Swami,
Guruprasada
Swami,
Prahladananda
Swami,
Ramai
Swami,
Sivarama
Swami,
Badrinarayan
Dasa,
and,
later,
Niranjana
Swami.
After
a
thorough
discussion,
the
members
of
this
committee
concluded
that
the
most
pressing
issue
to
address
was
the
tension
created
when
spiritual
masters
sometimes
act
as
an
independent
line
of
authority
within
ISKCON.
Focus
of
the
Essay
Hence,
this
essay
will
focus
exclusively
on
defining
principles
that
should
be
followed
by
initiating
or
instructing
spiritual
masters,
disciples
of
initiating
or
instructing
spiritual
masters,
Zonal
GBCs,
Regional
Secretaries,
Temple
Presidents,
and
other
ISKCON-‐authorized
managers.
The
aim
is
to
prevent
misunderstandings
between
spiritual
masters
and
managers,
as
well
as
to
minimize
the
influence
these
potential
misunderstandings
may
have
upon
devotees
under
their
combined
care.
1
"Spiritual
Master"
Means
Diksa,
Siksa,
or
Both
It
should
be
noted
that,
from
here
on,
unless
specified,
whenever
we
refer
to
"the
spiritual
master"
we
mean
both
initiating
spiritual
masters
and
instructing
spiritual
masters
(including
managers
who
act
as
such).
Additionally,
whenever
we
refer
to
"spiritual
authorities"
we
mean
anyone
(spiritual
master
or
manager)
whose
instructions
(siksa)
and
example
have
formed
the
foundation
of
a
devotee’s
faith
in
devotional
service
and
who
continues
to
build
on
that
foundation
of
the
devotee's
faith.
Authority
Within
ISKCON
This
essay
is
not
a
detailed
or
definitive
analysis
of
ISKCON’s
management
system,
nor
is
it
a
detailed
analysis
of
guru-‐tattva—the
requisite
qualities
and
duties
of
a
spiritual
master
and
the
process
of
choosing
a
spiritual
master.
The
basic
premise
of
this
essay
is
as
follows:
Whether
a
devotee
is
an
initiating
spiritual
master,
an
instructing
spiritual
master,
a
sannyasi,
a
Governing
Body
Commissioner,
a
Zonal
Secretary,
a
Regional
Secretary,
a
Temple
President,
a
congregational
leader,
or
anyone
else
in
a
position
of
authority
within
ISKCON,
the
authority
bestowed
upon
that
devotee
is
complete
only
if
he
or
she
follows
Srila
Prabhupada’s
instruction
to
serve
in
ISKCON
under
the
authority
of
the
GBC
Body.
To
establish
this
premise,
we
feel
we
need
do
no
more
than
emphasize
that
His
Divine
Grace
consistently
and
clearly
established
this
principle
in
his
teachings,
as
well
as
within
official
documents
he
himself
signed.
Srila
Prabhupada
thus
clearly
established
the
GBC
as
the
ultimate
managing
authority
and
also
indicated
that
the
GBC's
jurisdiction
includes
the
responsibility
to
offer
spiritual
guidance
(siksa)
to
the
whole
of
ISKCON,
including
all
devotees
serving
as
spiritual
masters:
Reporter:
"Is
there
anyone
who
is
designated
to
succeed
you
as
the
primary
teacher
of
the
movement?"
Srila
Prabhupada:
"I
am
training
some,
I
mean
to
say,
advanced
students
so
that
they
may
very
easily
take
up
the
charge.
I
have
made
them
GBC."1
In
other
words,
although
the
GBC
is
the
ultimate
managing
authority
in
ISKCON,
the
GBC's
duty
is
not
only
to
manage
but
to
teach.
Two
Lines
of
Authority
Since
every
devotee
accepts
his
or
her
spiritual
inspiration
from
higher
authorities,
two
lines
of
authority,
with
their
representatives,
exist
within
ISKCON—one
is
seen
as
primarily
spiritual,
while
the
other
is
seen
as
primarily
managerial.
Both
lines
of
1
Room
Conversation
with
Reporter,
Los
Angeles,
June
4,
1976
2
authority
serve
their
own
unique
yet
interdependent
purposes
in
submission
to
the
orders
of
our
Founder-‐Acarya.
Both
are
authorized
by
the
GBC
to
give
shelter
to
devotees
under
their
care.
This
shelter
is
given
through
both
instruction
and
example.
By
distinguishing
the
two
lines
of
spiritual
authority
in
these
terms—as
primarily
spiritual
or
primarily
managerial—we
are
not
suggesting
that
managerial
authority
is
contrary
to
spiritual
authority.
Nor
are
we
suggesting
that
the
spiritual
line
of
authority
is
somehow
more
privileged
or
intrinsically
more
pure.
"Management
is
also
spiritual
activity.
.
.
.
It
is
Krishna's
establishment."2
"In
our
preaching
work
.
.
.
we
deal
with
so
much
property
and
money
and
so
many
books
bought
and
sold,
but
because
these
dealings
all
pertain
to
the
Krsna
consciousness
movement,
they
should
never
be
considered
material.
That
one
is
absorbed
in
thoughts
of
such
management
does
not
mean
that
he
is
outside
of
Krsna
consciousness.
If
one
rigidly
observes
the
regulative
principle
of
chanting
sixteen
rounds
of
the
maha-‐mantra
every
day,
his
dealings
with
the
material
world
for
the
sake
of
spreading
the
Krsna
consciousness
movement
are
not
different
from
the
spiritual
cultivation
of
Krsna
consciousness."3
In
a
spiritual
society
a
manager
cannot
fulfill
his
or
her
duty
to
manage
simply
by
declaring
and
enforcing
rules.
The
rules
themselves
must
have
a
spiritual
foundation,
and
their
implementation
and
enforcement
must
be
applied
in
accordance
with
Vaisnava
principles.
Managers
who
serve
with
this
understanding
will
generally
carry
the
full
weight
of
spiritual
authority
for
those
under
their
charge.
We
should
therefore
see
the
oneness
between
"spiritual"
and
"managerial."
But
there
is
also
some
difference,
and
understanding
this
simultaneous
oneness
and
difference
requires
the
use
of
these
two
distinct
terms
with
their
explanations.
The
Spiritual
Line
of
Authority
The
spiritual
line
of
authority
begins
with
Lord
Krishna
and
continues
to
Brahma,
Narada,
Vyasa,
and
the
entire
disciplic
succession
through
Srila
Prabhupada,
our
Founder-‐Acarya.
Those
who
are
submissive
to
our
sampradaya
and
who
serve
under
the
authority
of
the
GBC
are
authorized
to
give
siksa
and
shelter
in
this
spiritual
line,
under
the
auspices
of
ISKCON.
This
spiritual
line
can
include
Governing
Body
Commissioners,
GBC
Zonal
Secretaries,
spiritual
masters,
sannyasis,
Regional
Secretaries,
Temple
Presidents,
congregational
leaders,
and
both
traveling
and
community
preachers.
In
fact,
anyone
who
strictly
follows
a
bona
fide
spiritual
2
Room
Conversation,
January
16,
1977,
Calcutta
3
Srimad
Bhagavatam,
5.16.3,
purport
3
master,
both
by
example
and
precept,
can
be
authorized
to
represent
the
spiritual
line
of
authority.
Generally
speaking,
the
most
prominent
spiritual
authority
is
one’s
initiating
or
instructing
spiritual
master.
The
scriptures
clearly
say
that
devotees
should
obey
and
be
loyal
to
their
spiritual
masters.
The
spiritual
masters
thus
exert
authority
over
their
disciples,
and
in
so
doing
the
spiritual
masters
are
able
to
train
and
educate
their
disciples
in
the
development
of
bhakti.
The
spiritual
masters,
therefore,
assume
a
significant
role
in
giving
their
disciples
the
spiritual
education
and
inspiration
necessary
to
advance
in
Krishna
consciousness.
The
Managerial
Line
of
Authority
In
the
managerial
line
of
authority,
and
in
accordance
with
Srila
Prabhupada’s
instructions,
the
supervision
of
the
Society
and
the
enforcement
of
its
rules
proceed
from
the
GBC.
When
we
use
the
word
"authority"
in
the
context
of
the
managerial
structure,
we
do
not
mean
an
absolute,
infallible
authority—such
as
the
authority
of
scripture—but
the
mandate
to
organize
the
preaching
movement
so
that
it
is
aligned
with
the
instructions
of
Srila
Prabhupada.
To
carry
out
that
mandate,
his
followers
have
adapted
ISKCON's
managerial
system,
given
by
Srila
Prabhupada,
to
take
into
account
the
proliferation
of
temples,
congregational
devotees
(who
are
not
temple
residents),
and
projects
like
farms
and
gurukulas,
as
well
as
other
favorable
organizations
and
entities.
Thus,
to
better
serve
this
expanding
field
and
its
members,
this
structure
presently
includes
various
regional,
national,
and
continental
governing
bodies
consisting
of,
but
not
limited
to,
Governing
Body
Commissioners,
GBC
Zonal
Secretaries,
spiritual
masters,
sannyasis,
Regional
Secretaries,
Temple
Presidents,
congregational
leaders,
and
both
traveling
and
community
preachers.
Defining
the
Point
of
Divergence
Although
in
an
ideal
world
everything
would
work
according
to
Srila
Prabhupada’s
vision
for
ISKCON,
we
have
seen
tendencies
from
those
in
one
line
of
authority
to
interfere
with
those
in
the
other
line
of
authority.
For
instance,
there
are
spiritual
authorities
who
sometimes
interfere
with
competent
and
responsible
managers.
They
do
not
consider
themselves
part
of
the
zonal
managerial
structure
where
their
preaching
has
influence
(though
they
are
in
fact
accountable
to
it),
but
they
are
still
either
directly
or
indirectly
managing
some
project(s)
within
that
structure.
Therefore
at
times
they
manage
devotees,
money,
and
even
projects
that
their
followers
and
dependents4
are
responsible
for,
without
a
clear
agreement
with
the
4
managerial
structure
with
which
they
intersect.
By
so
doing,
they
may
inadvertently
undermine
the
managerial
line
of
authority
by
encouraging
their
dependents
to
direct
their
service,
and
thus
their
loyalty,
to
their
spiritual
authority's
own
management
structure.
This
scenario
creates
not
only
confusion
but
a
spirit
of
separatism
as
well.
Situations
such
as
these
can
also
become
points
of
contention
for
managers,
although
the
more
junior
managers
often
refrain
from
directly
voicing
their
grievances
because
they
feel
intimidated
out
of
fear
of
committing
offenses,
especially
to
spiritual
masters.
On
the
other
hand,
there
are
also
managerial
authorities
who
sometimes
provide
inadequate
spiritual
care.
This
can
fuel
the
spiritual
master's
inclination
to
intervene
by
suggesting
an
alternative
for
his
disciple's
association
or
service.
For
instance,
managers
may
sometimes
place
greater
importance
on
management
goals
than
on
sadhana,
preaching
purely,
or
the
development
of
purity
in
the
devotional
service
of
those
under
their
care.
Managers
may
even
neglect
the
spiritual
development
of
those
within
their
jurisdiction
who
do
not
offer
resources
to
help
their
managerial
vision,
even
though
said
managers
may
have
done
little
to
inspire
help
from
them
or
to
empower
other
authorities
to
do
the
same.
Deference
to
the
Managerial
Line
of
Authority
The
above-‐mentioned
scenarios
cause
tension
between
the
spiritual
and
the
managerial
lines
of
authority.
Of
course,
it
is
understood
that
circumstances
do
arise
where
there
are
financially
independent
devotees
who
have
no
managerial
connection
with
locally
organized
sanghas.
Still,
it
should
not
be
assumed
that
no
effort
is
being
made
by
local
management
structures
to
include
every
devotee,
or
aspiring
devotee,
within
their
locally
managed
system
of
care
for
congregational
devotees.
Therefore,
with
respect
to
the
service
performed
by
ISKCON
managers,
a
spiritual
master
should
always
seek
approval
from
the
managers
overseeing
the
area
of
jurisdiction
in
which
his
disciples
are
living
before
suggesting
a
new
sangha
or
service
for
them,
or
intervening
in
other
managerial
decisions.
Best,
of
course,
is
to
train
the
disciples
to
offer
respect
to
their
local
managers
right
from
the
start
of
the
spiritual–master/disciple
relationship.
Many
ISKCON
managers
are
carrying
out
the
responsibility
of
maintaining
the
temples,
Deities,
book
distribution,
and
other
standards
given
to
us
by
Srila
Prabhupada.
4
"Dependents"
are
not
only
those
who
are
spiritually
dependent.
There
are
instances
where
devotees
are
also
financially
dependent
upon
their
spiritual
authorities
and
are
financially
maintained
by
the
structures
the
spiritual
authorities
have
themselves
created.
5
"Deity
installation
means
regular
worship
without
fail
and
for
good."5
Therefore
spiritual
masters
should
teach
their
disciples
to
serve
Srila
Prabhupada's
mission
by
cooperating
with
their
local
leaders
and
managers.
But
this
does
not
mean
that
a
manager
should
assume
that
he
or
she
has
complete
freedom
to
ignore
legitimate
needs
of
those
under
his
or
her
care
or
that
he
or
she
has
the
freedom
to
ignore
concerns
expressed
by
spiritual
masters
who
ask
them
to
see
that
their
disciples
are
properly
cared
for.
They
should
be
sensitive
to
the
concerns
of
the
spiritual
masters
as
well
as
their
disciples.
If
the
spiritual
master
still
strongly
feels
that
the
level
of
care
for
his
disciples
within
the
local
management
structure
is
inadequate,
taking
into
account
the
level
of
commitment
and
responsibilities
being
asked
of
them
(his
disciples),
then
he
may
appeal
on
their
behalf
to
the
higher
levels
of
management,
the
local
GBC,
or
other
ISKCON
avenues
of
appeal,
as
listed
later
in
this
paper.
More
on
this
point
will
be
addressed
later.
But
before
we
do
that,
we
will
first
briefly
discuss
the
topic
of
faith.
Those
in
both
lines
of
authority
would
be
well
served
to
consider
the
relevance
of
faith
to
the
broader
issues
being
discussed
here.
Authority
Is
Built
on
the
Continuous
Development
of
Faith
ISKCON’s
greatest
asset
is
the
faith
of
its
members.
Even
if
there
are
no
temples,
no
projects,
no
income,
and
only
a
few
followers,
if
there
is
faith,
there
will
be
prosperity,
in
the
true
sense
of
the
term.
Consider
what
Srila
Prabhupada
has
written
in
the
following
letter:
"There
is
a
proverb
in
Sanskrit
literature
that
enthusiastic
persons
achieve
the
favor
of
the
Goddess
of
Fortune.
In
the
Western
part
of
the
world
there
is
tangible
example
of
this
slogan.
People
in
this
part
of
the
world
are
very
much
enthusiastic
in
material
advancement
and
they
have
got
it.
Similarly,
according
to
the
instructions
of
Srila
Rupa
Goswami,
if
we
become
enthusiastic
in
spiritual
matters,
then
we
also
get
success
in
that
way.
Take
for
example,
I
came
to
your
country
in
ripe
old
age,
but
I
had
one
asset:
enthusiasm
and
faith
in
my
Spiritual
Master.
I
think
these
assets
only
are
giving
me
some
lights
of
hope,
whatever
I
have
achieved
so
far
with
your
cooperation."6
And
in
his
purport
to
“Bhagavad-‐gita
As
It
Is”
9.3,
Srila
Prabhupada
writes:
"Faith
is
the
most
important
factor
for
progress
in
Krishna
consciousness.
.
.
.
It
is
only
by
faith
that
one
can
advance
in
Krishna
consciousness."
5
Letter
to
Sivananda,
2
September
1971
6
Letter
to
Jaya
Govinda,
Tittenhurst,
15
October
1969.
6
Those
in
the
spiritual
line
of
authority
should
preach
and
behave
in
such
a
way
that
they
nourish
and
protect
their
dependents'
faith
in
pure
devotional
service,
in
our
sampradaya,
in
Srila
Prabhupada,
and
in
ISKCON,
including
its
management.
Spiritual
masters
also
have
the
added
responsibility
of
nourishing
and
protecting
ISKCON’s
managers'
faith
that
they
(the
spiritual
masters)
are
fit
representatives
of
the
spiritual
line
of
authority.
If
the
spiritual
masters
act
in
a
contrary
way,
they
will
erode
the
faith
of
others.
Conversely,
those
in
the
managerial
line
of
authority
should
manage,
preach,
and
behave
in
such
a
way
that
they
build
and
sustain
the
trust
of
those
in
the
spiritual
line
of
authority
and
their
disciples.
By
the
managers
showing
genuine
concern
for
the
devotees
under
their
care,
the
spiritual
masters
will
then
naturally
encourage
their
disciples
to
assist
the
manager
in
his
service.
But
if
managers
act
in
a
way
contrary
to
spiritual
principles,
in
conflict
with
the
spiritual
interests
of
those
devotees
for
whom
they
are
responsible,
that
will
also
erode
others'
faith.
Therefore,
to
safeguard
the
faith
of
all
of
ISKCON's
members,
it
is
necessary
that
we
delineate
clear
principles
for
both
lines
of
authority
to
follow.
Spiritual
Masters
Are
Not
Independent
To
further
clarify
the
need
to
introduce
well-‐defined
principles,
we
will
examine
the
position
of
spiritual
masters
within
the
managerial
structure
of
ISKCON.
When
Srila
Prabhupada
was
physically
present,
he
was
ISKCON’s
sole
initiating
spiritual
master,
its
preeminent
siksa
guru,
and
the
supreme
managerial
authority,
superior
to
the
GBC:
"[…]we
are
managing
our
Krishna
Consciousness
Movement
by
the
Governing
Body
Commission,
GBC.
We
have
got
about
20
GBC's
looking
after
the
whole
world
affair,
and
above
the
GBC
I
am
there.
Below
the
GBC
there
are
the
temple
president,
secretary,
treasurer
in
every
centre.
So
the
temple
president
is
responsible
to
the
GBC
and
the
GBC
is
responsible
to
me.
In
this
way
we
are
managing.."7
In
Srila
Prabhupada’s
physical
absence
the
structure
is
now
somewhat
different.
His
Divine
Grace
instructed
that
the
GBC
should
be
the
ultimate
managing
authority
for
ISKCON.
At
the
same
time
he
indicated
that
the
Society
should
have
multiple
spiritual
masters:
"Anyone
following
the
order
of
Lord
Caitanya
under
the
guidance
of
His
bona
fide
representative
can
become
a
spiritual
master,
and
I
wish
that
in
my
absence
all
my
disciples
become
the
bona
fide
spiritual
master
to
spread
Krishna
Consciousness
throughout
the
whole
world."8
7
Letter
to:
Vasudeva,
New
Vrindaban,
30
June,
1976
8
Letter
to
Madhusudana,
Navadvipa,
2
November
1967.
7
This
gives
rise
to
a
challenging
situation.
Many
spiritual
organizations
have
one
spiritual
master
operating
as
the
sole
head
of
the
institution,
whereas
ISKCON
has
many
spiritual
masters
within
one
organization,
in
addition
to
a
"governing
body"
that
operates
as
the
"ultimate
managing
authority"
for
the
institution
as
a
whole.
Those
serving
as
spiritual
masters
in
ISKCON
are
meant
to
follow
the
instructions
of
Srila
Prabhupada
and
work
under
the
GBC
Body.
The
spiritual
masters
are
thus
obligated
to
follow
the
Society's
policies
and
codes
of
conduct,
including
those
outlined
in
this
GBC-‐approved
paper,
and
to
abide
by
the
decisions
of
its
management.
Included
within
that
obligation
is
the
responsibility
to
inspire
their
disciples
to
associate
with
and
serve
within
ISKCON's
already-‐existing
managerial
and
devotee-‐care
sangas,
located
within
their
disciple's
area
of
residence
rather
than
only
inspiring
them
to
associate
with
themselves
(the
spiritual
masters)
or
with
their
sangas
and
projects
that
have
no
connection
with
the
ISKCON
zonal
management
structure.
Disciples
Should
Avoid
Creating
Conflict
Between
Their
Authorities
Disciples
should
also
understand
the
greater
picture
within
ISKCON.
Certainly
a
spiritual
master
may
be
more
spiritually
advanced
than
any
given
GBC
member
or
any
other
ISKCON
manager
(while
there
may
also
be
cases
where
the
local
GBC
or
ISKCON
manager
may
be
more
spiritually
advanced
than
a
particular
spiritual
master).
Nevertheless,
concerning
the
spiritual
management
of
the
Society,
as
we
have
already
clearly
shown,
Srila
Prabhupada
invested
authority
in
the
GBC
and
its
individual
members
and
in
other
ISKCON
managers.
If
a
disciple
has
the
mistaken
conviction
that
his
or
her
spiritual
master
is
above
the
GBC
and
ISKCON’s
laws
and
policies,
that
should
be
corrected
by
the
spiritual
master
and
other
authorities.
Otherwise,
that
misconception
may
lead
to
actions
which
create
conflict
between
his
or
her
spiritual
and
managerial
authorities
Indeed,
all
disciples
should
follow
their
ISKCON
authorities
in
the
same
way
that
all
initiating
and
instructing
spiritual
masters
should
follow
their
own
authorities
within
ISKCON.
By
both
example
and
precept,
therefore,
all
spiritual
masters
should
not
only
educate
and
train
their
disciples
in
the
development
of
bhakti
but
should
also
educate
and
train
them
about
their
relation
to
the
managerial
structure
of
ISKCON,
as
well
as
about
the
spiritual
masters'
own
relation
to
that
structure.
Principles
Being
Introduced
8
Education
of
guru's
disciples
It
is
the
responsibility
of
the
spiritual
masters
within
ISKCON
to
help
every
one
of
their
disciples
clearly
understand
the
following:
1)
The
spiritual
master
draws
his
authority
from
his
fidelity
to
Srila
Prabhupada.
This
includes
fidelity
to
Srila
Prabhupada's
order
to
work
within
his
mission,
ISKCON.
2)
The
spiritual
master
is
a
member
of
ISKCON
and,
as
such,
is
accountable
to
the
collective
will
of
its
leadership,
the
GBC
Body.
3)
The
spiritual
master
does
not
derive
any
specific
right
or
prerogative
over
ISKCON
resources
simply
by
dint
of
his
being
a
spiritual
master.
Moreover,
the
spiritual
master
should
not
misuse
his
rights
and
prerogatives
over
his
disciples.
4)
The
disciples
should
follow
their
ISKCON
authorities
in
the
same
way
that
all
initiating
and
instructing
spiritual
masters
set
an
example
by
following
their
own
ISKCON
authorities.
5)
Disciples
have
the
essential
task
of
surrendering
to
Krishna
through
the
spiritual
master,
and
included
within
this
task
is
recognizing
and
respecting
other
superiors
within
ISKCON's
management
who
are
helping
them
in
their
process
of
spiritual
progress.
6)
Spiritually
mature
managers
may
be
the
main
siksa
gurus
for
devotees
who
are
not
their
initiated
disciples,
and
such
relationships
are
to
be
fully
encouraged
by
the
initiating
spiritual
masters.
Conduct
of
gurus
Moreover,
to
show
respect
toward
the
managerial
line
of
authority
and
to
help
nurture
and
protect
managers'
faith
in
the
spiritual
line
of
authority,
every
spiritual
master
should:
1)
When
first
visiting
or
preferably
before
arriving
at
a
recognized
ISKCON
temple
or
preaching
center,
ask
the
local
manager
how
he
(the
spiritual
master)
may
serve
that
yatra
during
his
visit
(rather
than
the
spiritual
master
only
pursuing
his
own
agenda).
2)
Before
planning
a
visit
to
a
zone
or
region
where
there
is
no
local
temple
or
preaching
center,
first
ask
the
Zonal
GBC
if
there
is
a
vision
local
leaders
have
for
that
place
or
region
which
he
(the
spiritual
master)
could
serve.
9
3)
If
there
is
a
disagreement
in
terms
of
managerial
decisions,
do
his
best
to
cooperate
with
the
relevant
authority.
If
no
agreement
can
be
reached,
then
the
spiritual
master
should
defer
to
the
decision
of
the
relevant
authority,
with
the
option
of
appealing
to
higher
authorities
if
necessary.
Duties
of
Managers
To
build
cooperation
within
ISKCON,
show
respect
for
the
spiritual
line
of
authority,
and
help
nurture
and
protect
the
faith
of
spiritual
masters
and
their
disciples
in
the
managerial
line
of
authority,
all
managers
should:
1)
Be
receptive
to
advice
given
by
initiating
spiritual
masters
and
other
itinerant
preachers
visiting
their
area
of
jurisdiction,
especially
on
matters
concerning
devotee
care.
2)
Protect
the
faith
that
their
dependents
have
in
pure
devotional
service
and
in
the
principle
of
accepting
and
serving
an
initiating
spiritual
master
and
instructing
spiritual
masters.
3)
Encourage
and
support
a
system
of
devotee
care
(i.e.,
counselor
system,
brahminical
advisory
board,
etc.)
within
their
sphere
of
management.
4)
Assure
that
the
managers
in
their
line
of
authority
are
themselves
trained
in
the
principles
of
devotee
care.
5)
Inform
visiting
spiritual
masters
about
the
spiritual
health
and
overall
well-‐being
of
their
disciples.
6)
Encourage
and
help
visiting
spiritual
masters
and
other
itinerant
preachers
to
reach
out
to
those
disciples
who
are
in
need
and
who
would
be
most
responsive
to
their
help.
7)
Insure
that
there
is
an
equitable
system
for
initiation
recommendations
which
does
not
condone
unwarranted
pressure
or
manipulation
from
the
local
management
for
managerial
gains.
Summary
To
promote
the
full
flourishing
of
devotees'
spiritual
lives,
Srila
Prabhupada
created
for
ISKCON
a
managerial
structure
with
clear
lines
of
authority.
Every
member
of
ISKCON
should
respect
this
structure
and
learn
to
work
within
it.
The
goal
of
the
managerial
structure
is
spiritual:
to
facilitate
the
spiritual
advancement
of
ISKCON's
members
through
association
with
devotees,
opportunities
for
service,
and
effective
preaching
strategies.
Simultaneously,
ISKCON
affirms
the
fundamental
importance
of
accepting
initiation
from
a
bona
fide
spiritual
master.
10
Of
paramount
importance,
of
course,
is
our
Founder-‐Acarya,
Srila
Prabhupada,
who
is
the
initiating
spiritual
master
of
many
devotees
in
ISKCON
and
the
foremost
instructing
spiritual
master
of
every
devotee,
now
and
in
the
future.
Also
important
are
the
many
initiating
and
instructing
spiritual
masters
now
serving
in
ISKCON.
All
spiritual
masters
and
their
disciples
should
likewise
appreciate
the
importance
of
the
many
managers
in
our
society,
who
help
guide
and
train
disciples
and
oversee
the
facilities
ISKCON
provides
for
their
spiritual
advancement.
All
spiritual
masters
and
their
disciples
should
work
cooperatively
within
ISKCON’s
managerial
system,
both
to
benefit
themselves
spiritually
and
to
help
the
Society
flourish.
This
cooperative,
mutually
respectful
spirit
is
the
best
way
to
preserve
the
Society's
unity,
please
Srila
Prabhupada,
and
expand
the
sankirtana
mission.
In
the
mood
of
Lord
Caitanya,
Srila
Prabhupada
desired
that
the
sankirtana
movement
be
spread
all
over
the
world,
"to
every
town
and
village."
He
demonstrated
that
desire
by
his
constant
traveling,
writing,
and
speaking.
He
requested
his
disciples
to
open
centers
far
and
wide,
distribute
his
books,
arrange
for
attractive
festivals,
distribute
prasada,
etc.
It
was
Srila
Prabhupada's
desire
that
ISKCON
continue
to
expand,
to
rise
as
the
benediction
moon
of
Lord
Caitanya's
mercy.
It
is
for
this
purpose
that
Srila
Prabhupada
established
ISKCON
as
a
spiritual
institution
with
a
managerial
structure.
The
purpose
of
this
structure
is
to
maintain
the
standards
he
established,
to
offer
shelter
and
spiritual
nourishment
to
the
devotees,
and
to
support
and
increase
the
sankirtana
mission.
To
please
Srila
Prabhupada
by
delivering
the
mercy
of
Sri
Sri
Gaura-‐Nitai
to
the
conditioned
souls,
everyone
within
ISKCON—spiritual
masters,
disciples,
and
managers
alike—should
work
cooperatively
within
this
structure.
[end]
11इनमें उद्धृत
0अभी तक किसी अभिलेख में उद्धृत नहीं।