GBC Decision Regarding Lokanath Swami, approved 20 July 2022
ISKCON Governing Body Commission (PDF hosted by ISKCON News)
Resolution of ISKCON's Governing Body Commission approved on 20 July 2022 and released on 7 September 2022: it endorses the review panel's recommendation not to reopen the Lokanath Swami case, affirms that regional governing bodies may restrict him, and bars him from initiating where the regional body has not welcomed him. The file is the PDF posted by ISKCON News, as archived on 3 March 2023. Nothing redacted: the decision refers to the complainant only as "the Minor".
GBC Decision Regarding Lokanath Swami, approved 20 July 2022
Loading document…
Arrow keys change page, + and − zoom, 0 resets.
Details
Files
1Each file is stored under its SHA-256 hash. To verify a download, run sha256sum on it and compare.
SHA-256
7a4b01d6847224210a3ac387100e57fdfdea074a7fe2ee274df5c5a31058d807
Extracted text
Text extracted automatically from the file for search. The file itself is the record; check it before quoting.
Show extracted text
GBC DECISION REGARDING LOKANATH SWAMI
Approved 20th July, 2022
WHEREAS, in 1990, a devotee invited Lokanath Swami to stay with his family for
several days while recovering from a serious injury. The host also “requested
Lokanath Swami to train and impart Indian culture to his youngest daughter, who
was eleven and a half years old at the time” (the “Minor”).
WHEREAS the Minor alleged to ISKCON’s Governing Body Commission (“GBC
Body” or “GBC”) three years later that Lokanath Swami had touched her
inappropriately during his stay in the Minor's home;
WHEREAS, the GBC took these allegations seriously and immediately launched an
investigation, which included reaching out to the Minor and her family. The
investigation also included a review by independent mental health experts. The GBC
also imposed certain restrictions on Lokanath Swami;
WHEREAS, the minor (then an adult) raised the issue again in 2010, 20 years after
the original event(s). The GBC then reopened the matter and imposed additional
restrictions on Lokanath Swami;
WHEREAS, there was recently discussion about reopening the Lokanath Swami
matter for a third time;
WHEREAS, the GBC appointed a Review Panel whose work resulted in the Review
Panel Report of the Lokanath Swami Matter (“the Report”);
WHEREAS, the GBC found the Review Panel’s in-depth and professional Report
to be helpful and insightful;
WHEREAS, the Review Panel members, unanimously agreed that:
(a) the allegations concerning Lokanath Swami had been fully investigated in
both 1993 and again in 2010-2011;
(b) these investigations were adequately documented;
(c) Lokanath Swami substantially complied with the restrictions imposed on him;
and
(d) the Lokanath Swami matter be referred back to the GBC to act on the Review
Panel’s recommendations.
WHEREAS, The GBC plans to adopt the attached Resolution 301.02 requiring that
henceforth any plausible claim of abuse or misconduct be directly referred to the
appropriate ISKCON agency rather than to the GBC body;
Based on ISKCON’s ecclesiastical principles and practices as well as the Report, BE
IT THEREFORE RESOLVED, that:
1. The GBC Body endorses the Review Panel’s recommendation that the
Lokanath Swami matter, already twice adjudicated, not be reopened for
further proceedings as no new relevant facts pertaining to this matter have
come to light, as of the date hereof.
2. The GBC Body reaffirms its existing policy that an ISKCON Regional
Governing Body (“RGB”) or similar body has the right to restrict any devotee
from visiting and preaching in their region(s), such as has already been done
in North America.
3. Lokanath Swami shall not initiate disciples, in person or virtually, in any
region or area where he has not been welcomed by the relevant RGB or similar
body of area leaders. In the case of rare exceptions that may be proposed to
the RGB (or similar body), the GBC Executive Committee (“EC”) will assist
in reaching an agreeable outcome.
4. This present Resolution is based on and limited to the facts described
herein.Cited in
0Not yet cited in any record.